Posts in July 2007

Processing Experiment

Michael Forrest
Sun 15 Jul 2007
Christian (http://nuthinking.com) showed off Processing on Thursday. I have used it to make this (rather heavy) Java applet. Tis very silly, but does the sort of thing I was hoping to be able to do :)

www.cinestatic.com/michaelforrest/bounce

Use this link if you have no microphone

(P.S. Bruce did the drawing on my Facebook grafitti wall)

That's it from me for a while

Michael Forrest
Wed 11 Jul 2007
I'm going into seclusion.

In about six months' time I will bring you something new.

Music takes time doesn't it.

Michael Forrest
Thu 05 Jul 2007

What time is it?
Originally uploaded by michaelforrest
I'm listening to Four Tet (great stuff) and coming to a realisation.

I don't think I find it particularly difficult to come up with the elements of music. Those elements don't even have to be amazingly perfect to satisfy me (although I do have very high production standards, it has to be said). However, what I am lacking is the time to come up with, and knit together, these elements in sufficient volume.

Actually - that's not even true - I have TONS of stuff since doing the Installations! I just haven't found time to put it all together. I got all excited about my 'Every Day I Do Things Wrong' project, but I haven't found the time to edit everything together. I have all sorts of other bits and pieces that I want to polish up and deliver too.

I get lonely though. Sat there in my flat on my own 'producing'. Why can't it be more like an office where there are always people to talk to? And testers to report when I'm being a bit sloppy? And project managers to make sure I'm on schedule? Hm... would I like that? I dunno - I might!

Aaaaaargh

Michael Forrest
Wed 04 Jul 2007

Look at it all there
Originally uploaded by michaelforrest
Fuckity fuck fuck this!

I need a break. This gig next Tuesday (or Thursday, if it happens) is the last one I'm gonna do for a while. I'll send back the Jazzmutant and go on holiday. There's a plan.

What's a good thing to do for a holiday?

What makes a great live performance?

Michael Forrest
Mon 02 Jul 2007


  • Those bits at the end of tracks where a riff takes over, the noise intensifies, the jamming gets freeform; when the energy peaks, anything goes - it's deafening, exhilarating

  • A crowd being able to sing along; this can be awfully cheesy, but it's an undeniable sense of unification with a mass of other people all feeling the same as you

  • In a piece with a set and recognisable structure (e.g. a song) - unexpected pauses allowing the tension to be stretched until finally the music drops and everybody goes crazy

  • A band playing (and stopping) TOGETHER - an intricate structure - the more members and instruments the better - the less obvious signalling the better - the more unpredictable the better

  • A great front man (or woman, yes) who engages the audience - someone funny, charismatic, in control. Also - great personal interactions between band members.

  • A 'show' can be excellent if done well. Costumes. I'm thinking about Beck here

  • In dance music: a respect for the audience and maintaining an elemental pulse throughout any sonic deviations


Is Live Electronica A Paradox Then Or What?

Michael Forrest
Mon 02 Jul 2007


If I practice something, if I am trying learn a structure by rote, I am an naturally inclined toward the automation of the performance. But I am REALLY not interested in standing on a stage miming to a backing tape.

I have been working on a truly live approach to performing electronic music for years. Ableton Live was a godsend, especially with Reason piped through. I still find Live limiting in that it can only have one time signature per track and has unsophisticated quantising, but other than that it does more or less what I want. I discovered it when I was attempting to create my own software to do this sort of thing - but where my software was very free and visual (in theory..), Live is all about quantisation and locking everything to a strict beat.

I think a lot of the success of my 'Installation' experiment came from the fact that the music was truly live. It always started from scratch. It may have taken a while to get going sometimes but even then it was obvious that I was DOING something. It was not artificially limited by a decision to automate one thing but not another - I was making the software work to its strengths.

Not all gigs, however, are three hours long. I am back into the statutory 45 minute slots again, in front of healthier audiences, but thrown back into that panicked confusion over how to prepare. My practices, when not dominated by software and hardware configuration or audio file organisation, frequently end up with me jamming over some random little tune I played to test a patch, and turning into material that was lovely then but never becomes a fully structured 'track'. These tangents are where a lot of my live sets come from, but they lack that recognisability that can only come from working with established music that people have already heard.

I don't know if I'm fighting a paradox or not. I could distill my live set to a perfectly executed backing track but then it wouldn't be live. Or I could do what I'm doing now: not practice much and rely on naturally occurring hooks to latch onto and work with. That's risky. Risk looks great, but it's... well... risky - there will be gaps where the quality flounders. Or a mixture - some prerehearsed stuff - perhaps the more vocal stuff - deviating into jamming when a hook emerges.

Pah - I don't think I'm getting any closer to an answer. This entry branched into a 'what makes a great gig?' listing - I'm going to post that list next in the hope of distilling its essence into something I can use...